McQueary said that although he saw this, but he was not 100 percent sure that the two were having intercourse. He stated that he never described what he saw as anal rape or anal intercourse but “it looked like intercourse was going on.” McQueary said,
"I told them that I saw Jerry in the showers with a young boy and that what I had seen was extremely sexual and over the lines and it was wrong. I would have described that it was extremely sexual and I thought that some kind of intercourse was going on."
This is important testimony because the grand jury summarized statement said McQueary saw a boy “being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky." McQueary’s testimony today said that he was not 100 percent sure it was intercourse and never saw Sandusky’s genitals.
McQueary’s testimony today is similar to the grand jury summary but today’s testimony was less “matter of fact” about what McQueary saw compared to the grand jury summary.
Stay tuned for more updates.